Comments on 'Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing'

Back

Next

aerobique (January 8th, 2009 @ 12:41 am)
"my only problems with this are A. where did the water come from?.." It is ice from space.
Simonttg (January 7th, 2009 @ 11:35 pm)
my only problems with this are A. where did the water come from? B. where did the increase in mass come from? First law of science, mass cannot be created or destroyed. Something can't just grow unless its gaining something, and for the a PLANET to grow like that, it would need a HELL-OV-A-LOT of mass to do so. Good try, but this kinda discovery would be made public in a science magazine before it hit youtube... remember just cuz you read it doesn't make it true
MorituriMax (January 7th, 2009 @ 10:42 pm)
neal, "You are a NAY-SAYER. You contradict anything I say, " What's really funny is that you yourself nay-say everything else anyone here says that contradicts anything YOU say.
MorituriMax (January 7th, 2009 @ 10:40 pm)
neal, "Max, No, If you took the time to analize ot Those are the THREE choices, basically. If there was another choice, someone in 20,000 letters would have mentioned it. You are a NAY-SAYER. You contradict anything I say, simply for the sake of contradicting me. It's quite preposterous." Maybe they just don't have the time to waste here like me and dave. And neal, another possibility why I always contradict everything you say, is that everything you say is wrong. Ever consider that? Cheers!
Blackmark52 (January 7th, 2009 @ 10:03 pm)
Stars are balls of flaming gas hundreds of times larger than the earth. A simple conceptual comparison of a balloon and a rock should be able to tell you which is more susceptible to changes in size. There is no reason to "discount" the young sea floor. That is accounted for in plate tectonics. The proponents of this "theory" are closing their eyes to a very big flaw. If the claim is that the earth has grown, the very first thing addressed should be why and how is it growing.
mtakman (January 7th, 2009 @ 9:49 pm)
Population reduction, go read sustainable economic growth sign by Clinton 2004 they will reduce world populaTION BY BILLIONS watch Zeitgeistmovie com you are in for a shock of your life TheOneRevolution09 (1 week ago) Show Hide +1 Marked as spam Reply | Spam - Come & watch "REVOLUTION" Help it go viral!
Agogaraxis (January 7th, 2009 @ 9:04 pm)
stars radiate so why not planets in the form of solid matter(theres lots of pressure under our feet).
Casmige (January 7th, 2009 @ 9:01 pm)
Here's a startling but neat theory:- Maybe the Earth is Hollow....!!@@!! & it is Merely expanding outward due to centrifugal forces & also via the expulsion of the Magma. Just respectfully throwing something else into the mix... Please juggle & correct me, please...
Preacha1111 (January 7th, 2009 @ 7:51 pm)
The law of conservation of matter shows that the quantity of matter cannot be increased or decreased. Matter can be converted into other forms but the amount of matter does not hange. Therefore it isn;t possible for the earth to "grow" it is possible for it to expand though. THis expansion can be seen as growth if one chooses to call it that but nametags are irrelevant.
nealadamsdotcom (January 7th, 2009 @ 3:13 pm)
Max, No, If you took the time to analize ot Those are the THREE choices, basically. If there was another choice, someone in 20,000 letters would have mentioned it. You are a NAY-SAYER. You contradict anything I say, simply for the sake of contradicting me. It's quite preposterous.
jlettis (January 7th, 2009 @ 2:27 pm)
And yes things can just appear out of seemingly nothing. It's like the frog in the well, he can't imagine the ocean. Asking modern scientists looking at the universe from a multidimensional view is like asking the frog in the well to understand the vastness of the ocean. Not likely to happen, the frog in the well will continue to insist there is no water beyond the well. That's what we have here, a lot of narrow, shallow world views.
jlettis (January 7th, 2009 @ 2:23 pm)
Blackmark52- Why is it then we have the stars expanding and collapsing or growing and shrinking. What is the mechanism behind that? How can everyone discount the young sea floor and the fact that the continents fit together because they can't understand a mechanism? Is that how science works? If you can't explain something observable then you close your eyes and refuse to look at it? I don't want any part of that kind of "science".

Next